Codex 5.3 Refactor Note: Canonical refactor plan: docs/CODEX-5.3-REFACTOR-PLAN.md. This document is retained for historical and implementation context during the refactor.
W8 Implementation: Hiring Manager Review (Scorecard + Submit + Escalate)
Status: ✅ Complete (Backend + UI + Documentation) Version: 1.0 Date: January 26, 2025
A. Summary
Implement manager review workflow where assigned hiring managers fill a scorecard (6 categories, 1-5 rating scale), save drafts, submit with validation (≥3 rated, summary required, comments for low ratings ≤2), lock edits, and escalate to SMO. HR/SMO can view read-only.
Key Design Principle: Manager-only editing with completion gates
- Status progression: MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING → (submit) → MANAGER_REVIEWED → (escalate) → TO_SMO
- Default scorecard with 6 built-in categories (extensible to template system in W9)
- Average score calculation (auto-updated in real-time)
B. Routes
UI Page
- Location:
/candidates/[id]?tab=manager-review - Component: Client-side tab in candidate detail page
API Endpoints
-
GET /api/candidates/[id]/manager-review
- Fetch draft or empty structure
- Returns
isEditablebased on role + status
-
PUT /api/candidates/[id]/manager-review
- Save draft (no outcome validation for draft)
- Returns updated review with parsed responses
-
POST /api/candidates/[id]/manager-review/submit
- Submit with strict validation (≥3 rated, summary required)
- Status transition: MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING → MANAGER_REVIEWED
- Returns review + updated candidate
-
POST /api/candidates/[id]/escalate-to-smo
- Escalate to SMO (only after submitted)
- Status transition: MANAGER_REVIEWED → TO_SMO
- Returns updated candidate
C. Data Model Changes
New Enums
enum ManagerReviewMode {
QUICK // V1: 6-question template (future: FULL, CUSTOM from W9)
}
enum ManagerRecommendation {
PROCEED // Offer stage
KIV // Keep in view
REJECT // Not moving forward
}
CandidateStatus Enum Update
enum CandidateStatus {
NEW
HR_SCREENED
MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING // ← Updated flow (was MANAGER_EVAL_COMPLETED)
MANAGER_REVIEWED // ← New status for submitted review
TO_SMO
DECISION_MADE
COMPLETED
}
New Model: ManagerReview
model ManagerReview {
id String @id @default(cuid())
candidateId String @unique
candidate Candidate @relation(fields: [candidateId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade)
// Scorecard content
mode ManagerReviewMode @default(QUICK)
responsesJson String @db.Text // JSON: [{categoryId, categoryName, rating, comment}]
recommendation ManagerRecommendation?
summaryNotes String? // Required on submit
// Submission tracking
submittedAt DateTime? // NULL while draft, set on submit
submittedByUserId String?
submittedBy User? @relation("ReviewSubmittedBy", fields: [submittedByUserId], references: [id], onDelete: SetNull)
createdAt DateTime @default(now())
updatedAt DateTime @updatedAt
@@index([candidateId])
@@index([submittedByUserId])
@@index([submittedAt])
}
Enhanced Candidate Model
model Candidate {
// ... existing fields ...
managerReview ManagerReview? // One-to-one relation
}
Enhanced User Model
model User {
// ... existing fields ...
submittedReviews ManagerReview[] @relation("ReviewSubmittedBy")
}
New Audit Event Types
enum AuditEventType {
// ... existing ...
MANAGER_REVIEW_DRAFT_SAVED // PUT save draft
MANAGER_REVIEW_SUBMITTED // POST submit (status transition)
SENT_TO_SMO // POST escalate (status transition)
}
Migration
Name: add_manager_review_and_escalation
Changes:
- Add ManagerReviewMode enum
- Add ManagerRecommendation enum
- Update CandidateStatus enum (MANAGER_EVAL_COMPLETED → MANAGER_REVIEWED)
- Create ManagerReview table
- Add managerReview relation to Candidate
- Add submittedReviews relation to User
- Add 3 audit event types
D. UI Components
Candidate Detail Page (Updated)
File: src/app/(app)/candidates/[id]/page.tsx
Changes:
- Import ManagerReviewTab component
- Add tab routing:
?tab=manager-review(via useSearchParams) - Tab navigation button for "Manager Review"
- Tab content conditionally renders ManagerReviewTab
Manager Review Tab (New)
File: src/app/(app)/candidates/[id]/_tabs/ManagerReviewTab.tsx (650 lines)
Architecture:
- Client component with local state management
- Fetches review on mount via GET endpoint
- Auto-calculates average score (real-time)
- Section A: Read-only snapshot
- Section B: Interactive scorecard (6 categories)
- Section C: Recommendation + summary notes
- Header actions: Save Draft, Submit Review, Escalate to SMO
State Management:
review: Fetched ManagerReview object or nullresponses: Map of categoryId → {rating, comment}recommendation: Selected recommendation (PROCEED/KIV/REJECT)summaryNotes: Summary textarea valuesubmitted: Boolean flag for submission stateexpandedSections: Toggle state for 3 sectionsloading,saving: UI states
Section A: Candidate Snapshot (Read-only)
Fields:
- Position (applyingFor)
- Current Status (status)
- Assigned Manager (hiringManager.fullName, email)
Behavior:
- Non-editable, display-only
- Shows context of who is reviewing
Section B: Manager Scorecard
6 Built-in Categories:
- Technical / Domain Fit
- Execution / Delivery
- Communication
- Ownership / Accountability
- Team Fit / Collaboration
- Learning Ability / Adaptability
Rating Interface:
- 5 buttons (1-5) per category
- Selected rating highlighted in blue
- Real-time average score calculation shown in header
Conditional Comments:
- If rating ≤2, comment textarea appears (red border)
- Label: "Comment (required for ratings ≤2)"
- Required on submit if rating ≤2
Auto-calculation:
- Average score = (sum of rated values) / (number of rated categories)
- Displayed in section header, updated in real-time
Section C: Recommendation & Notes
Recommendation Radio Buttons:
- PROCEED: "Proceed to offer"
- KIV: "Keep in view"
- REJECT: "Reject"
Summary Notes:
- Required field (validation enforced on submit)
- Max 2000 characters
- Placeholder: "Summary of your assessment..."
Submission Status:
- After submit, show green info box: "Review Submitted - Submitted on [date]"
- Fields become read-only (disabled state)
Header Actions
Save Draft Button:
- Label: "Save Draft"
- Gray background
- Enabled if status = MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING (draft mode)
- Disabled after submit
Submit Review Button (Primary):
- Label: "Submit Review"
- Blue background
- Enabled if status = MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING and validation passes
- Disabled after submit
- On success: transition to MANAGER_REVIEWED, lock editing
Escalate to SMO Button (Shown after submit):
- Label: "Escalate to SMO"
- Purple background
- Enabled only after submit (submittedAt not null)
- Opens confirmation modal
- On confirm: transition to TO_SMO
Escalate Modal
- Title: "Escalate to SMO?"
- Message: "Are you sure you want to escalate this candidate to SMO for decision? This action cannot be undone."
- Cancel button, Escalate button
- Disabled state during submission
Read-only View (HR/SMO)
- All form fields disabled (gray background, cursor: not-allowed)
- Header action buttons hidden or disabled
- Display message: "You can view but not edit this review"
Gating Messages
- If status = NEW/HR_SCREENED: "Manager review is not available until HR assigns a manager and completes screening."
- If status = TO_SMO/DECISION_MADE: "Review has been escalated to SMO. No further edits allowed."
Styling:
- Expandable sections (arrow rotates)
- Form inputs: gray border, focus blue ring
- Rating buttons: 40px circle, hover effect
- Comments field: red border, red background (for low ratings only)
- Average score badge: blue background in header
- Submission status: green info box
E. API Logic
1. GET /api/candidates/[id]/manager-review
Purpose: Fetch review draft or empty structure
RBAC:
- Assigned manager: Can view & edit (isEditable = true if status = MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING)
- HR/ADMIN: Can view read-only (isEditable = false)
- SMO: Can view read-only (isEditable = false)
Response (200 OK):
{
"id": "hrs-...",
"candidateId": "cm-...",
"mode": "QUICK",
"responses": [
{
"categoryId": "technical",
"categoryName": "Technical / Domain Fit",
"rating": 4,
"comment": ""
},
{
"categoryId": "execution",
"categoryName": "Execution / Delivery",
"rating": 2,
"comment": "Needs improvement in project delivery"
}
],
"recommendation": null,
"summaryNotes": "",
"submittedAt": null,
"submittedByUserId": null,
"isEditable": true
}
If no review exists yet: Returns empty structure with all categories at default (rating: null, comment: '')
Error Responses:
- 401: Unauthorized
- 403: Forbidden (not assigned manager/HR/SMO)
- 404: Candidate not found
2. PUT /api/candidates/[id]/manager-review
Purpose: Save draft scorecard (allows partial state, no validation for draft)
RBAC: Assigned manager or ADMIN only
Request Body:
{
"responses": [
{
"categoryId": "technical",
"categoryName": "Technical / Domain Fit",
"rating": 4,
"comment": null
},
{
"categoryId": "execution",
"categoryName": "Execution / Delivery",
"rating": 2,
"comment": "Needs improvement"
}
],
"recommendation": null,
"summaryNotes": "Solid technical foundation..."
}
Validation:
- No validation on draft (allows incomplete state)
- Ratings must be 1-5 if provided
- Responses format validated (categoryId, categoryName, rating, comment)
Response (200 OK): Updated review object with all fields
Behavior:
- Creates ManagerReview if not exists
- Updates existing review if exists
- Stores responses as JSON in database
- Logs
MANAGER_REVIEW_DRAFT_SAVEDevent - Preserves previous recommendation/summaryNotes if not provided in request
Error Responses:
- 400: Validation failed
- 401: Unauthorized
- 403: Forbidden (not assigned manager/admin)
- 404: Candidate not found
- 409: Candidate not in MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING status
3. POST /api/candidates/[id]/manager-review/submit
Purpose: Submit review with strict validation (locks editing, transitions status)
RBAC: Assigned manager or ADMIN only
Request Body: Same as PUT
{
"responses": [
{ "categoryId": "technical", "categoryName": "Technical / Domain Fit", "rating": 4, "comment": null },
{ "categoryId": "execution", "categoryName": "Execution / Delivery", "rating": 3, "comment": "" },
{ "categoryId": "communication", "categoryName": "Communication", "rating": 5, "comment": null },
{ "categoryId": "ownership", "categoryName": "Ownership / Accountability", "rating": 4, "comment": null },
{ "categoryId": "team_fit", "categoryName": "Team Fit / Collaboration", "rating": 3, "comment": "" },
{ "categoryId": "learning", "categoryName": "Learning Ability / Adaptability", "rating": 4, "comment": null }
],
"recommendation": "PROCEED",
"summaryNotes": "Strong candidate with solid technical background and good communication skills..."
}
Validation (Strict - all errors block submission):
-
Minimum Rated Categories: ≥3 categories must be answered
- Error: "At least 3 categories must be rated"
-
Summary Notes: Required and non-empty
- Error: "Summary notes are required"
-
Conditional Comments: For all responses with rating ≤2, comment required
- Error: "Comments required for ratings of 2 or below"
-
Status Check: Candidate must be in MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING
- Error: "Candidate must be in MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING status"
Response (200 OK):
{
"review": {
"id": "hrs-...",
"candidateId": "cm-...",
"mode": "QUICK",
"responses": [...],
"recommendation": "PROCEED",
"summaryNotes": "Strong candidate...",
"submittedAt": "2025-01-26T14:30:00Z",
"submittedByUserId": "user-...",
"averageScore": "3.83",
"isEditable": false
},
"candidate": {
"id": "cm-...",
"status": "MANAGER_REVIEWED",
"candidateCode": "HR-001",
"fullName": "John Doe",
"hiringManager": {...}
}
}
Behavior:
- Creates or updates ManagerReview
- Sets
submittedAttimestamp - Sets
submittedByUserIdto current user ID - Calculates average score from all rated categories
- Status Transition: MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING → MANAGER_REVIEWED
- Logs
MANAGER_REVIEW_SUBMITTEDevent with recommendation, score, answered count - Logs
CANDIDATE_STATUS_CHANGEDevent (dual logging for audit trail)
Error Responses:
- 400: Validation failed (with specific error message)
- 401: Unauthorized
- 403: Forbidden (not assigned manager/admin)
- 404: Candidate not found
- 409: Candidate not in MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING status
4. POST /api/candidates/[id]/escalate-to-smo
Purpose: Escalate candidate to SMO after manager review submitted
RBAC: Assigned manager or ADMIN only
Request Body: Empty (no parameters)
Validation:
-
Status Check: Candidate must be in MANAGER_REVIEWED status
- Error: "Candidate must be in MANAGER_REVIEWED status to escalate to SMO"
-
Submitted Check: Manager review must have submittedAt timestamp
- Error: "Manager review must be submitted before escalating"
Response (200 OK):
{
"id": "cm-...",
"status": "TO_SMO",
"candidateCode": "HR-001",
"fullName": "John Doe",
"hiringManager": {
"id": "user-...",
"fullName": "Alice Johnson",
"email": "alice@company.com"
},
"message": "Candidate escalated to SMO successfully"
}
Behavior:
- Status Transition: MANAGER_REVIEWED → TO_SMO
- Logs
SENT_TO_SMOevent with manager name/email - Non-blocking logging (doesn't affect API response)
- No email sent (notifications future feature)
Error Responses:
- 401: Unauthorized
- 403: Forbidden (not assigned manager/admin)
- 404: Candidate not found
- 409: Candidate not in MANAGER_REVIEWED status OR review not submitted
F. RBAC Checks
Role-Based Permissions Matrix
| Role | GET Review | PUT Draft | POST Submit | POST Escalate | View (Read-only) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manager (assigned) | ✅ Edit | ✅ Edit | ✅ Submit | ✅ Escalate | N/A (edits) |
| Manager (other) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| HR | ✅ (R/O) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| SMO | ✅ (R/O) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| ADMIN | ✅ Edit | ✅ Edit | ✅ Submit | ✅ Escalate | N/A (edits) |
| USER | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Enforcement Points
Backend (API routes):
- Check
user.id === candidate.hiringManagerIdfor edit operations - Check
user.role === 'ADMIN'for admin override - Check
['HR', 'SMO', 'ADMIN'].includes(user.role)for read-only access - Enforce status checks (MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING for drafts/submit, MANAGER_REVIEWED for escalate)
Frontend (UI component):
- Get userId from session/localStorage
- Compare against
candidate.hiringManagerId - Show action buttons only if assigned manager
- Show fields as disabled if not assigned manager
- Show read-only message if user is HR/SMO/Admin
G. Audit Logging
Events
1. MANAGER_REVIEW_DRAFT_SAVED
- Trigger:
PUT /api/candidates/[id]/manager-review - Metadata:
{ "candidateId": "cm-...", "candidateCode": "HR-001", "answeredCategories": 3 } - Actor: Manager or Admin
- Timestamp: Automatic
- Blocking: No (non-blocking audit)
2. MANAGER_REVIEW_SUBMITTED
- Trigger:
POST /api/candidates/[id]/manager-review/submit - Metadata:
{ "candidateId": "cm-...", "candidateCode": "HR-001", "recommendation": "PROCEED", "averageScore": "3.83", "answeredCategories": 6 } - Actor: Manager or Admin
- Timestamp: Automatic
- Related Event: CANDIDATE_STATUS_CHANGED (dual logged)
3. SENT_TO_SMO
- Trigger:
POST /api/candidates/[id]/escalate-to-smo - Metadata:
{ "candidateId": "cm-...", "candidateCode": "HR-001", "managerName": "Alice Johnson", "managerEmail": "alice@company.com" } - Actor: Manager or Admin
- Timestamp: Automatic
- Related Event: CANDIDATE_STATUS_CHANGED (if tracked separately)
Related Event: CANDIDATE_STATUS_CHANGED
- Trigger: Auto-logged by POST submit
- Metadata:
{ "candidateId": "cm-...", "candidateCode": "HR-001", "oldStatus": "MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING", "newStatus": "MANAGER_REVIEWED", "trigger": "manager_review_submitted" }
H. Manual Testing Checklist
Pre-flight Setup
- Database running (Postgres)
- Prisma migrations applied:
npx prisma migrate dev --name add_manager_review_and_escalation - API server running:
npm run dev - Have 2+ users created: 1 HR, 1 Manager
- Have 1 candidate with status MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING (HR screening completed, manager assigned)
Test Case 1: Manager Opens Review & Sees Empty Scorecard
Setup: Candidate at MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING, logged in as assigned manager
Steps:
- Navigate to
/candidates/{candidateId}?tab=manager-review - Verify all 6 categories visible with no ratings
- Verify Section A shows: Position, Status, Assigned Manager (self)
- Verify header shows: Save Draft, Submit Review buttons (enabled)
- Verify "Escalate to SMO" button NOT visible (hidden until submit)
- Verify average score shows "0" or empty
Expected:
- All form fields editable
- No error messages
- Scorecard ready for input
Test Case 2: Manager Rates Scorecard & Saves Draft
Setup: Continue from Test Case 1
Steps:
- Rate "Technical / Domain Fit": 4
- Rate "Communication": 2 (triggers comment requirement)
- Verify comment textarea appears for Communication (red border)
- Add comment: "Good communication in meetings"
- Rate "Ownership / Accountability": 5
- Verify average score updates to ~3.67 (4+2+5)/3)
- Click "Save Draft"
- Verify toast/alert: "Draft saved successfully"
- Refresh page
- Verify all ratings and comment persisted
Expected:
- Real-time average score calculation
- Comment field appears/disappears based on rating
- Draft saved and reloadable
- No status change (still MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING)
- Audit log shows MANAGER_REVIEW_DRAFT_SAVED event
Test Case 3: Submit Without Validation (Error Cases)
Setup: Continue from Test Case 2 (3 categories rated)
Steps:
- Try to submit without Recommendation selected
- Expected: No validation on recommendation (optional)
- Try to submit without Summary Notes
- Expected: Toast error: "Summary notes are required"
- Rate one more category (4th) with rating 2, no comment
- Try to submit
- Expected: Toast error: "Comments required for ratings of 2 or lower"
- Add comment for the rating 2
- Rate 3rd category as 1 (poor), no comment
- Try to submit
- Expected: Toast error: "Comments required for ratings of 2 or lower"
- Add comment for rating 1
- Now try submit with ≥3 rated + summary + comments for low ratings
- Expected: Success
Expected:
- Clear, specific error messages
- No status change until validation passes
- User can fix and retry
Test Case 4: Submit Successfully (Status Transition)
Setup: Scorecard with ≥3 rated + comments for low ratings + summary
Steps:
- Ensure at least 3 categories rated
- Add Summary Notes: "Strong candidate with solid technical foundation"
- Select Recommendation: "PROCEED"
- Click "Submit Review"
- Verify toast: "Review submitted successfully"
- Verify status badge changes: MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING → MANAGER_REVIEWED
- Verify all form fields become disabled (gray, cursor: not-allowed)
- Verify green info box: "Review Submitted - Submitted on [date]"
- Verify "Save Draft" & "Submit Review" buttons disappear
- Verify "Escalate to SMO" button NOW appears & enabled
- Refresh page, verify state persisted
Expected:
- Status transitioned to MANAGER_REVIEWED
- Editing locked (all fields disabled)
- Escalate button available
- Audit logs: MANAGER_REVIEW_SUBMITTED + CANDIDATE_STATUS_CHANGED events
Test Case 5: Escalate to SMO
Setup: Candidate at MANAGER_REVIEWED with submitted review
Steps:
- Click "Escalate to SMO" button
- Verify confirmation modal: "Are you sure you want to escalate..."
- Click "Cancel" → modal closes, status unchanged
- Click "Escalate to SMO" button again
- Click "Escalate" button in modal
- Verify toast: "Candidate escalated to SMO successfully"
- Verify status badge: MANAGER_REVIEWED → TO_SMO
- Verify "Escalate to SMO" button disappears
- Verify message: "Review has been escalated to SMO. No further edits allowed."
- Refresh page, verify status persisted
Expected:
- Status transitioned to TO_SMO
- Escalate button removed
- Audit log shows SENT_TO_SMO event with manager details
Test Case 6: HR/SMO Can View But Not Edit
Setup: Candidate at MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING, logged in as HR user
Steps:
- Navigate to
/candidates/{candidateId}?tab=manager-review - Verify Section B scorecard fields visible but DISABLED
- Try to click rating button → no response (disabled)
- Try to type in comment field → field non-interactive
- Verify "Save Draft" button HIDDEN or DISABLED
- Verify "Submit Review" button HIDDEN or DISABLED
- Verify "Escalate to SMO" button HIDDEN
- Verify Section A, B, C all visible but read-only
- Verify gray background on all form inputs
Expected:
- Complete read-only view for HR/SMO
- No editing capability
- All information visible for review purposes
- Clear indication of read-only state
Test Case 7: Manager Review at Wrong Status (Error)
Setup: Candidate at NEW status
Steps:
- Try to navigate to manager review tab
- Verify message: "Manager review is not available until HR assigns a manager and completes screening."
- Try to call PUT endpoint:
PUT /api/candidates/{candidateId}/manager-review - Verify error 409: "Cannot edit manager review at this stage"
Expected:
- UI shows appropriate gating message
- API enforces status validation
- No accidental review creation at wrong status
Test Case 8: Only Assigned Manager Can Edit
Setup: Candidate assigned to Manager A, logged in as Manager B
Steps:
- Navigate to
/candidates/{candidateId}?tab=manager-review - Verify read-only view (fields disabled)
- Try to call PUT endpoint as Manager B
- Verify error 403: "Forbidden"
- Log in as Manager A (assigned manager)
- Verify editable view (fields enabled)
- Save draft successfully
Expected:
- Only assigned manager can edit
- Other managers get read-only view
- Clear RBAC enforcement
Test Case 9: Admin Can Do Everything
Setup: Candidate at MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING, logged in as ADMIN
Steps:
- Edit and save draft (as assigned manager would)
- Submit review successfully
- Escalate to SMO successfully
- No permission errors at any step
Expected:
- Admin bypasses role check
- Admin can act on behalf of manager
- Full control over workflow
Test Case 10: Audit Trail Verification
Setup: Complete Test Cases 2-5 (draft → submit → escalate)
Steps:
- Query audit logs for candidate
- Verify events in order:
- MANAGER_REVIEW_DRAFT_SAVED (test 2)
- MANAGER_REVIEW_SUBMITTED (test 4)
- CANDIDATE_STATUS_CHANGED (MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING → MANAGER_REVIEWED) (test 4)
- SENT_TO_SMO (test 5)
- Verify metadata contains:
- candidateId, candidateCode
- recommendation, averageScore, answeredCategories
- managerName, managerEmail (for escalate)
- Verify actor user ID matches logged-in user
- Verify timestamps in ascending order
Expected:
- Complete audit trail
- Metadata matches operations
- All events non-blocking (didn't delay responses)
Test Case 11: Average Score Calculation
Setup: Scorecard with varied ratings
Steps:
- Rate categories: 5, 4, 3, 2, 2, 1 (6 categories)
- Verify average shown: (5+4+3+2+2+1)/6 = 2.83
- Update rating 1 to 4 (remove lowest)
- Verify average updates to: (5+4+3+2+2+4)/6 = 3.33
- Remove rating from one category (set to null/unrated)
- Verify average recalculates excluding unrated: (5+4+3+2+2+4)/5 = 4.0
Expected:
- Real-time average calculation
- Only counted rated categories (excludes null)
- Precision to 2 decimal places
Test Case 12: UI/UX - Expandable Sections
Setup: Manager review tab open
Steps:
- Verify all 3 sections expanded by default
- Click Section A header → collapses (chevron rotates)
- Content hidden, can click to expand again
- Toggle sections multiple times
- Verify independent toggling (expanding B doesn't collapse A)
Expected:
- Smooth section collapse/expand
- Chevron icon rotation animation
- Independent state per section
Post-Flight Checks
- No TypeScript compilation errors
- No console errors during testing
- All status transitions working correctly
- Audit logs complete and accurate
- Average score calculation accurate
- RBAC enforcement strict (no unauthorized access)
- Performance acceptable (< 1s for API calls)
- UI responsive and accessible
Summary
W8 successfully implements manager review with:
✅ Complete Backend: 4 API endpoints with validation, RBAC, audit logging ✅ Complete Frontend: Candidate detail tab + ManagerReviewTab component with 3 sections ✅ Database Schema: ManagerReview model + enums + relationships ✅ Validation: Zod schemas with ≥3 criteria rule, summary required, comments for low ratings ✅ Status Progression: MANAGER_EVAL_PENDING → MANAGER_REVIEWED → TO_SMO ✅ Scorecard: 6 built-in categories with 1-5 rating scale, extensible for W9 templates ✅ RBAC: Only assigned manager can edit; HR/SMO/Admin read-only ✅ Audit Trail: 3 event types with detailed metadata ✅ Real-time UX: Average score calculation, conditional comments, expandable sections
Status: Production ready pending Postgres database availability
Next Steps (W9+):
- Custom scorecard templates per role
- SMO decision workflow (W10)
- Notifications integration
- Reporting dashboards